Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKafeero, Hussein Mukasa
dc.contributor.authorNdagire, Dorothy
dc.contributor.authorOcama, Ponsiano
dc.contributor.authorKato, Charles Drago
dc.contributor.authorWampande, Eddie
dc.contributor.authorWalusansa, Abdul
dc.contributor.authorKajumbula, Henry
dc.contributor.authorKateete, David
dc.contributor.authorSendagire, Hakim
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-16T11:08:58Z
dc.date.available2022-05-16T11:08:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.iuiu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/20.500.12309/786
dc.description.abstractThe Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a highly infectious virus and is endemic in Uganda. It is one of the major etiological agents for liver diseases including liver cancer. In this work, we evaluated the prevalence of the HBV serological markers and the associated socio-demographic factors among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seronegative persons screened during routine immunization against the virus in eastern Uganda. Data on the socio-demographic characteristics were collected using a structured questionnaire, while that on the serological markers were obtained from serum samples and evaluated by using the 5-panel HBV One Step Hepatitis B Virus Combo Test Device ( FastepR, HBV-P43M). The following markers were evaluated by the panel: HBsAg, HBsAb, HBcAb, and HBeAb. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 26), and multinomial logistic regression was used to elicit the adjusted odds ratio. All the analysis were performed at a 95% confidence limit, and a P value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. The 424 participants included in this study were mainly female (62.3%), married (55.4%) and aged 30 years and above (54.2%). The seropositivity of the HBsAb, HBeAb, HBcAb marker prevalence rates was 48(11.3%), 73(17.2%) and 45(10.6%) respectively. The majority of the participants (327, 77.1%) did not present with any marker. Married paricipants were significantly associated with reduced HBsAb seropositvity rate, whereas young people aged 18–29 years were associated the with increased odds of HBsAb seropositivity (p < 0.05). Male participants were significantly associated with the HBeAb and HBcAb seropositivity (p < 0.05). Similarly, contact with an HBV infected person was significantly associated with HBeAb and HBcAb seropositivity (p < 0.05). Further still, blood transfusion was significantly associated with the increased risk of HBcAb seropositivity (P < 0.05). This study has revealed a prevalence of HBV serological markers among the HBsAg seronegative persons in this community and an increased risk of transmission of the virus in the community. Our findings have key consequences pertaining the interventions that are pertinent in the control and prevention of the spread of the virus among apparently health persons. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the causative agent for liver inflammatory diseases, which, if not diagnosed in a timely manner and subsequently managed, are likely to progress to chronic liver diseases, liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, and liver cancer1. The virus has been implicated as one the most common oncogenic virus in humans2. It is a highly transmissible virus and is 50 to 100 times more infectious than Human Immune deficiency Virus (HIV). In addition, it has extreme resilience, allowing it to survive for several days on dry surfaces. This complicates its epidemiology and explains the increased chances of intra-familial horizontal transmissions3. Despite the presence of a safe and highly efficacious vaccine, HBV infection is still one of the major global health problems4. The Uganda Population-Based Impact Assessment (UPHIA) 2016–2017 survey reported a drastic decrease in the prevalence of HBV in Uganda5. According to this survey, the national prevalence of HBV dropped from 10% in the general population in 20156 to 4.3% in 2016 and 4.1% in 2017, with east-central posting a prevalence of 2.1%. However, HBV is a chronic infection and these data are suggestive of either massive death of the chronically infected persons or a higher level of sero-conversion to HBsAb between the sampling intervals. Nevertheless, the rapid sero-conversion indicated by a high prevalence of the HBsAb with normal levels of the correlates of liver damage over a short period of time seems to be unrealistic. Similarly, the drastic decrease in the risk of infection because of improved immunity or public health awareness appears idealistic. The relative importance of the socio-demographic factors to HBV infection varies from population to population7, and their contribution to community spread of HBV have been previously reported with concordance in some studies and contradictions in other studies8– 12. Understanding these sociodemographic factors related to infection and their relationship with markers of HBV exposure will provide plausible answers to the recent drastic decline in HBV in Uganda. To understand the sero-prevalence of hepatitis B virus, screening of a large number of people is needed. Serological markers for detection of HBV are diverse13 and include hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), hepatitis B pre-core antibody (HBeAb), hepatitis B pre-core antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). However, in resource limited settings, screening for hepatitis B virus infection is limited to only the HBsAg using the rapid diagnostic test. Unfortunately, the use of a single marker of exposure is associated with vast irregularities in the diagnosis of HBV. This inconclusive diagnosis is likely to mislead clinicians in their decisions when managing the HBV-infected persons as well as the decision to discard donated blood for transfusion by local and regional blood banks. HBV exposure markers have high sensitivity but low specificity, justifying the need to investigate them not in isolation for comprehensive case management and explicit assessment of blood for transfusion. The Anti-HBc is characteristic of a hidden HBV carrier state and/ or resolved disease14. Anti-HBs antibodies are associated with acquired immunity either due to previous exposure and natural response to the virus or due to vaccination15, whereas the Anti-HBe antibody is a marker of the minimally infective phase and disease remission or recovery from the infection16. Thus, as eluded from above, the relative significance of different sociodemographic risk factors for infection, the comparative expression of markers of liver damage and the relative prevalence of different markers of exposure to HBV at the community level can provide constructive clues on the trend of HBV prevalence and infectivity in a population. Consequently, we sought to understand the current state of the risk factors for HBV infection and the prevalence of the markers of immunity against HBV among HBsAg seronegative individuals to justify the drastic reduction in the burden of HBV in Uganda.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the Islamic University in Uganda (IUIU) through the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Grant (Grant number: IsDB-IUIUI-001) awarded to Hussein Mukasa Kafeero by the Research Publications and Innovations (RPI) department of the Islamic University in Uganda (IUIU) for his doctoral studies and the Makerere University Research and Innovation Fund (MakRif) awarded to Hakim Sendagire.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Reportsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11535-8
dc.titleHepatitis B virus (HBV) serological patterns among the HBsAg negative hospital attendees screened for immunizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record