Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKafeero, Hussein. M.
dc.contributor.authorWalusansa, Abdul
dc.contributor.authorAsiimwe, Savina
dc.contributor.authorIramiot, Stanley . J
dc.contributor.authorSsenku, Jamilu. E.
dc.contributor.authorNakavuma, Jesca. L.
dc.contributor.authorKakudidi, Esezah. K.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T10:14:29Z
dc.date.available2021-03-11T10:14:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-28
dc.identifier.citationAPAen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.iuiu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/20.500.12309/747
dc.description.abstractBackground: Infectious diseases remain a leading cause of mortality and morbidity around the world, and those caused by bacteria are common in the East African region. In this region, trade and consumption of herbal medicine has been expanding in the recent decades. Herbal medicines may be contaminated with pathogenic bacteria; however, there is limited information due to fragmented studies in East Africa. In this meta-analysis, we critically analyzed original research related to the incidence of pathogenic bacterial contaminants of HM in the East African region since 2000. The aim was to create a comprehensive understanding of the extent and dynamics of bacterial contamination in HM, to guide future research and concerted public health protection in the region. Methodology: The study was conducted according to the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. We searched and evaluated published articles from eleven electronic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, HerbMed, MEDLINE, Science Direct, Scifinder Scholar, Cochrane Library, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts and Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau Abstracts). Prevalences of different bacterial species, Cochran’s Q test, and the I2 statistic for heterogeneity were evaluated using a software called MedCalcs. Random and fixed effects models were used to determine the pooled prevalence of clinically significant bacteria from studies which were included in this meta-analysis. The potential sources of heterogeneity were examined through sensitivity analysis, sub-group analysis, and meta-regression at 95% level of significance. Results: Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the studies were highly heterogeneous (I2 = 98.48%) and there was no evidence of publication bias. Escherichia coli was the most prevalent contaminant. Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp. were the most frequently reported primary pathogens with pooled prevalence of 10.4% and 6.3%, respectively. Our findings are in tandem with recent systematic reviews conducted in Europe and Asia, but are in discrepancy with the reviews recently conducted in southern Africa. Conclusion and recommendations: The East African herbal medicine industry poses considerable health risks to communities through dissemination of clinically significant bacteria. Presence of enteric bacterial contaminants indicates possible fecal pollution of herbal medicine region-wide. Adequate research pertaining to microbial safety of herbal medicine in the East African countries remains highly desired. The latter will enable establishment of strong, region-wide herbal safety mechanisms in order to support comprehensive public health protection in East Africa.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors hereby declare noen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTropical Medicine and Healthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;10
dc.subjectBacterial contamination, Herbal medicine, East Africa, Systematic reviewen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and dynamics of clinically significant bacterial contaminants in herbal medicines sold in East Africa from 2000 to 2020: a systematic review and meta analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record